关于“Explore a lakehouse”的评价

charlie k. · 评论1 day之前

Yevhenii O. · 评论1 day之前

Leonard H. · 评论2 days之前

Good, but too short

Joe S. · 评论3 days之前

Neal A. A. · 评论3 days之前

ROCK HARD

Madhur N. · 评论3 days之前

Gajera D. · 评论3 days之前

connell O. · 评论3 days之前

Lisa H. · 评论4 days之前

Ashish S. · 评论4 days之前

Reetik S. · 评论4 days之前

Femi O. · 评论4 days之前

Viking V. · 评论5 days之前

Prayoga S. · 评论5 days之前

Dima Y. · 评论5 days之前

Something strange is going on in the editing of the Scenario. It reads: Artem explains that while an external table only points to data stored elsewhere, like in a data lake. In this case, you would likely want the data to be stored in a standard BigQuery table because it will be easier to manage and update. Meredith has also asked you to import data from a CSV file to update the product costs, so you ask Artem if you should use an external table for that task too. Artem explains that while an external table only points to data that is stored someplace else, like a data lake, in this case you probably want the data stored in a standard BigQuery table, since it will be easier to manage and update. -- THe first paragraph is mispunctuated and seems to be repeated as the third paragraph.

Laurie W. · 评论6 days之前

Ritam G. · 评论6 days之前

Ilya Y. · 评论6 days之前

George N. · 评论6 days之前

Luiz Claudio C. · 评论7 days之前

awesome

Bhargav P. · 评论7 days之前

Mayank B. · 评论7 days之前

Christoph K. · 评论8 days之前

Nam L. · 评论8 days之前

Emil D. · 评论8 days之前