关于“Entity and Sentiment Analysis with the Natural Language API”的评价

Awesome

Ashish N. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Philjae K. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Content is awesome

Prateek S. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Gabor S. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

David S. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

ionut z. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Jason Christian W. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Louisse Kayle P. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Robert J. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

David S. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Fabio B. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

good lab

Sameer M. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Vincent T. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

There is a serious issue to report with the Artificial Intelligence "Magnitude" rating system found herein: In the first example we see an magnitude of only .1 for the saying "I think everyone should read it." Which is a positive reaffirming statement and carries quite a bit of magnitude, as defined to be "Weight of sentiment expressed." Ok, now, here's where the real problem lies--- The next sentence was something about sushi and service being terrible. This rendered a magnitude of .9 because most likely the word "terrible" being in the sentence. Now this is problematic from a huge ethical standpoint and allow me to speculate here: AI being used to screen possible candidates for employment or team recruitment for govt. or other operations. In the intelligence field, sometimes individuals with criminal and or other "negative demerits / marks" on their records and files will be experiencing an inordinate amount of bias from Google Artificial Intelligence by a ration of 8/1!!! That's fucking ridiculous and basically retarded. Where did that amount of bias come from? It needs to at least be EVEN, that is to say 1:1 ratio, because someone's "positive or reaffirming" sentiment weighs in at 1:8 vs someone's slight or negatively interpreted aspects are weighing it at 8:1? I am a security analyst working in part with the federal government, and this needs to be IMMEDIATELY addressed before continuing to be released and developed by the public at large. If you have any issues please contact my office: Robert Brooks Authement CEO; Briq Haus Ltd. Security & Intelligence (970) 427-4884

Robert A. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

I think we should build more bases. Thanks you!

jang s. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Course was clear, but Cloud Shell did not work well using Edge

Steve V. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Great

Amar L. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Sudipta B. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Bruno S. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Tushti N. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Nice and easy to use simple API for Natural Language processing.

Krishna B. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Brad N. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

OK

Victor David S. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Ali I. · 已于 over 7 years前审核

Great simple lab and everything works for me. Bookmarked the NLP analysis documentation.

Marc L. · 已于 over 7 years前审核